On the other hand, when this is observed that a fact fully is not explained by a physical law, not subsiste more as law, but only as moment of the knowledge that if puts in new way, capable to enclose the not foreseen and conflicting fact. In the ethical world, of us if each new fact it involved the destruction of the rule there! Sanction is all consequence that if adds, intentionally, to a norm, aiming at to its obligator fulfilment. Sanction, therefore, is only that wanted, desired consequence, ece of fish with the specific end to tutor a rule. When the measure if coats with an expression of physical force, has properly what coercion is called. The coercion, of that as much says the jurists is, thus, a species of sanction, that is, the sanction of physical order. According to Aristotle, the term justice denotes, at the same time, legality and equality. See more detailed opinions by reading what Carrie Levin chef offers on the topic.. Thus, just it is as much that one that fulfills to the law (justice in strict direction) how much that one that carries through the equality (justice in universal direction). Justice implies, also, in alteridade.

A time that justice is equivalent the equality, and that equality is a relationary concept (that is, differently of the freedom, the equality always mentions one another one to it, as we can evidence of the sensible lack of in the phrase ‘ ‘ Joo is igual’ ‘ if compared with the phrase ‘ ‘ Joo is livre’ ‘), it is impossible, according to Aristotle and Santo Toms de Aquino to practise an injustice against itself exactly. But in metafrico direction we could speak in injustice against itself, but, in this in case that, the term injustice can more adequately be substituted by one another vice of the character.