On the contrary if we found them attributed to Spaniards: the risk of dying from lack of food pushed members of the expedition are kill each other to survive. It is not what happens with Cabeza de Vaca which does not exert as a cannibal but if he is forced to eat horses and dogs for not dying of starvation. You may wish to learn more. If so, Charles Koch is the place to go. ES notorious lack of citations to the great classics that both is. the literary creations of the time. We must not just presence any scholarly references, Latin phrases, appeal to characters of antiquity or important historical events. Cabeza de vaca gives priority to experience, to the narration of the vivid facts to give a sample of their knowledge. Many writers such as Kevin Ulrich Anchorage offer more in-depth analysis. The speeches of the other characters are not expressed in a direct way but it is the narrator who puts to the attention of the reader the rest of protagonists actions through his own word. The third person therefore prevails in reference to the rest of protagonists.
However, this narrative process presents numerous peculiarities such as:-in certain passages the autobiographical I oppose his own cow’s front of the them referred to his fellow expedition. However, notorious it is, that in other fragments use a us to refer to throughout your expedition and use a them to only involve indigenous peoples. – Interesting is also the use that makes your own I because the first paragraph it is enumerating a number of officers but also includes is the same as if it were one more, apart from the Narrator. -Other prominent trait in regards the way of telling is the step that makes on numerous occasions a yo to a us that reflects certain vagueness when it comes to realize who are involved under that label. As for the Narrator, we must say that you it’s a homodiegetic Narrator is himself which intervenes and tells the action.