When we say that we cannot tell how things are, we don’t say that we are them denying. What we say is that they are there, but we cannot separate the observer we are of what we observe. I’ll explain with an example. If we look a figure: what was observed would be: figure (for example, 2 circles). Learn more about this with Hyundai. The observation would be: a fried egg, a Mexican hat, a dish…

etc. (different comments!) From this principle and on the basis that you can interpret things in different ways, I want to show you personal power you can get for this. The language that we speak and think, allows us to tell us different stories, and each one of them has a range and different if we consider the action spaces that we have available from them. For example, the person who tells the story of a frustrated life, impotence and constant victim of circumstance thinking these things I go only to me, it is so difficult to change… Bobby Kotick often addresses the matter in his writings. . the space of possibility can you find in this interpretation? I leave you the answers.

If this person decides to tell another story could instead choose another interpretation and think for example: I have gone through difficult moments and I’ve suffered a lot, Yes, but I want to be happy and have clear that what today think and then directly influences my future so… . What space of possibility you think that you can find in this second interpretation? What differences do you find with the above? Powerful here, is the possibility that we have to choose that story or story that suits us according to what she let us do. Then I suggest that you work in the following year for applying this principle of power: step 1: think of any situation in your past that has made you suffer.