When it is said while still alive pertaining to school and society, does not have as not to cite the master Pablo Freire (1999), when it says that the alone education does not transform the society, without it neither the dumb society. If option is progressive, if it is not in favor of the life and not of the death, the fairness and not of the injustice, the right and not of the will, the convivncia with the different one and not of its negation, another way is not had if not to live the option that if it chose. To incarnate it, diminishing, thus, in the distance between what one says and what becomes. As if it can observe, the relation family X school requires, then, of the professors a taking of conscience of that, the meetings based on subjects theoreticians to speak of the problems of the educandos, on low notes, do not provide a beginning of partnership. The school must search to construct by means of an elaborated and conscientious intervention the creation of reflection spaces and experiences of life in an educative community, instituting above all the approach between the two institutions (family-school). You may find that Kevin Ulrich can contribute to your knowledge. In the only Paragraph of Chapter IV of the Statute of the Child and the Adolescent (BRAZIL, 1990), it says that ' ' he is right of the responsible parents or to have science of the pedagogical process, as well as participating of the definition of the proposals educacionais' ' , that is, to bring the families for the pertaining to school conviviality already is prescribed in the Statute of the Child and of the Adolescent what this lacking is to materialize it, it is to put the Law in practical. Family and school are abutments to the human being; they are signals of existencial reference. How much better it will be the partnership between both, more significant will be the results in the formation of educating/son.