Of the norm anteladamente glossed, we see that in this opportunity the term to that we have come making reference, from this regulation, changes drastically and the one of 30 days settles down first of all, calendars, so that in their maximum end is the one of six months. Situation different from which previously came regulating. Before such situations it must indicate, that the mentioned norms, were dictated to the shelter and in the light of the use of the Penal Procedural Code of 1991, the same that kept silence on this respect. In so understood, and when entering use the Penal Procedural Code of 2004, tacitly has such standardisations voted and sanctioned prior to dacin of this Code, would have been countermanded tacitly, to the regulated being the matter (of the principle of opportunity and reparatorios agreements), by this one new norm (NCPP), and in addition when procedural existing an incongruity as far as the penal system that inspired to both procedural statutes (inquisitive Mixed System versus accusatory System with adversariales characteristics). However, of explicit way these norms have not been countermanded by the organ sent that them, but we understand that when entering use the NCPP, would have countermanded all those norms given prior to their entrance in use. Then, when affirming it has then that the norm that at the moment regulates the term for the payment of the civil repair (in the reparatorios application of the opportunity principle and agreements), it is the Penal Procedural Code of 2004, and like so, when indicating this one, in its numeral 03, that when the parts are not agreed with respect to the term of the payment of the civil repair, will be the Public prosecutor establishes that it, not exceeding the nine months; it must be included/understood on the other hand in interpretation, that if the parts reach an agreement with respect to the term of the payment of the repair of the damage, this one validly could exceed the nine months, being to freedom and criterion of the parts to establish this term. In that order of ideas, the parts or could decide a greater term to the nine months for the payment the RC, for example, 12 months or 18 months, being valid and legal this agreement. Since the will of the parts is superior to the established thing by the Public prosecutor, because of which if these in use of its faculties, going voluntarily to the call of the principle of opportunity or agreement reparatorio, they indicate his assent with respect to his content and term, the Public prosecutor CANNOT maintain that the maximum term to that they must arrive for the payment, is solely of NINE MONTHS, since if the will of the parts is to decide that it is pleased the civil repair in a greater term to the nine months, the Public prosecutor must respect this agreement meticulously. Finally and closing ideas, we will say that of normado by the literal article 02 03 of the Penal Procedural Code of 2004, it is inferred that when arriving the parts at an agreement with respect to the term of the payment of the repair of the caused damage (reparatorios Principle of Opportunity or agreements), this one good could exceed the nine months, in attention, as already has been indicated, to the will of the parts, which cannot be not known nor be avoided by the Public prosecutor.
Francisca said to me once: papa, I entered to a difficult university race; statistically at the end of the first year only it approves the 20% of which they entered, reason why the probability that I fail east year is of 80%. I said to him; you are not a statistic, are Francisca, the statistics do not decide what will happen in the future with you, speak of the past and the decisions that were taken in the past. Perhaps they are or for an historical description or a journalistic report and to consider information that allows to design the future, . Soon I added the following question: Francisca, what you would say to me if I ask to you which is the probability that you are within 20% that is successful? and it responds: is high that probability, because I am studious. Then the specific probability for Francisca to fail is not 80% because it depends than she does in future, not than it was made before, not of the statistic. The statistical information is merely referential and influence is so much more referential the more exerts our will in what it is tried to design.
The predictions or the prognoses – in as much they are affirmations whose veracity can verify only a time after the affirmation became, serve when we cannot have control on the events whose result is tried to foretell, but lack utility and they are transformed into a tie to obtain results when the motor of the S-events the human will, that is to say, when there is control of the events. In this case the predictions operate like inhibiting of the will. We can predict an eclipse tomorrow affirming for example will verify an eclipse of sun to the 10:23 A.M. , because we cannot influence in that event.
On the other hand, it saw the face of my companions and perceived a feeling similar to mine, nevertheless, was evident that to leave the way at the moment it was not already an option. We arrive at the case of the property, which was a good first passage of credibility, because a servant doubted that we went to at least find a construction in that one zone moved away of everything. My friend, the expert, descended from his light truck, detector was armed with the equipment, and with a spirit to give by finished everything of the possible fastest way it requested, us to the others that we remained near the vehicle while he it unfolded its technology. While my friend moved away of us, us we are platicando of other subjects nonrelated, making jokes and admiring the landscape, that is possible to indicate era very attractive. My friend realised a sweeping of the land around the construction and returned without making no commentary on the results that had thrown the apparatuses, when all we lived a great desperation on the matter to know its verdict, nevertheless my friend called to me and it asked to me that it realised the same activity that moments before had carried out, with the intention of to corroborate the data, that at this moment continued being a great incognito. He instructed me in the handling of the equipment, he gave precise instructions me of the place search and he asked to me that he did not say anything but until finalizing. For that then, I already had a version of the place on the part of the farmer. The construction was an old built barn of stone and lime, with very wide walls and the vaulted ceiling. In front of the entrance of the building there was a species of good stone corral finished, that was made up of a circular wall of meter and half of stop with a single entrance.
We live in a culture where we have become addict to the approach of the conversational approval. That is to say, the exercise of ” to give approval to feel aprobado” d to place all along. Tenth something and immediately ” receptor” it also comments something. And this happens almost of immediate way and without pauses. There are customary ” to the noise of mundo”. All we are responsible to live in conscience, nevertheless, we are but time with the autopilot who in our center. I will give some examples you that prove this.
As much noise has fed us the inconciencia and we indicated in the communication of different ways through our personality and styles to it to communicate: The Sabelotodo: You are an expert finalizing the orations of other people. You interrupt to finish whatever the communication. A question, one doubt, a commentary, an opinion This way you impose your ” inconcientemente; car-control” giving the message that you know everything to it. Invalidating the opinion of others although it is not that your conscious intention. The Robot: Listening and your head it seems a piata. Accompanied by ” Umju” your head moves of above downwards in continuous ” si” like approving everything what they say to you. Giving reason so that they accept to you. This behavior makes readable and it give force you of approval to whatever the conversation, it does not matter if subject or no.
is draining and nor so at least it give account you. The Astronaut: The one that Speech watching at all the others! to the moon, the horizon, to Pluto, less to the eyes of the person with who it talks. It would seem that there are ten people around yours, so that knowing your that goes, it seemed that speaks to them to all the others. These are only three, of other so many ways of personified styles of communication. Declared of different ways, nevertheless dividing of the same place Excess of mental activity. The noise separates to us from silence and it supports to us to evade important truths that we wished to ignore. Everything in excess brings desbalance. You have put yourself to think That so if the words that nontenth cause but to impact that the ones that indeed is listened to? What so if a single question creates but impact that an oration? , Serious what if silence and the face or verbal expression do not communicate but that thousand words? What so to practice silence? To be scared to the solitude is to fear to him to silence. To fear to him to silence is to fear to the thoughts and feelings to him that they connect to your interior. And if sights inwards these not watching towards outside. And to watch towards outside is to live in the responsibility not being given your power always having a good justification. The moments of silence are the ideal atmosphere to connect with your greatness and espiritualidad. Concdete 15 minutes in silence and writes on your experience. Silencio is tool of your Wisdom. How silence can be a tool of Peace at this moment of your life? This week you do of silence your Treasure!